> -----Original Message----- > From: cpufreq-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpufreq-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > On Behalf Of Viresh Kumar > Sent: 2013年4月26日 12:41 > To: Tang Yuantian-B29983 > Cc: rjw@xxxxxxx; cpufreq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Lists > linaro-kernel > Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Fix the driver can not be unloaded issue > > On 26 April 2013 07:09, Tang Yuantian-B29983 <B29983@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Exactly. > > Currently, we don't consider the offline cpus when setting policy->cpus. > > Probably other platforms do the same thing. > > But this is a requirement of cpufreq framework and drivers must adapt to > it. > Let me know which drivers don't meet this requirement and i will get them > fixed. OK, I will take care of this in my driver. I have no idea about other drivers. Regards, Yuantian > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the > body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at > http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ?韬{.n?????%??檩??w?{.n???珉z??^n?■???h?璀?｛?夸z罐?+€?zf＂?????i?????_璁?:+v??撸?
