Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 9 [cpufreq: NULL pointer deref]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/15/2013 10:51 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 15 April 2013 21:37, Dirk Brandewie <dirk.brandewie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If the intel_pstate driver is being used __cpufreq_governor() should NOT be
called intel_pstate does not implement the target() callback.

Nathan's commit 5800043b2 changed the fence around the call to
__cpufreq_governor() in __cpufreq_remove_dev() here is the relevant hunk.

No it isn't.

+       if (has_target)
                 __cpufreq_governor(data, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);

As it has taken care of this limitation.

BUT some of my earlier patches haven't. :(
Here is the fix (Sedat please try this and give your tested-by, use the attached
patch as gmail might break what i am copying in mail)..

Sorry for being late in fixing this issue, i am still down with Tonsil infection
and fever.. Today only i got some power to fix it after seeing Dirk's mail.

Your tested-by may help me to recover quickly :)


Hehe.
Me myself and I was today chez-mon-docteur... Let's see the results on Thursday.
Again, get well soon.

Tested against...

  "BROKEN" Linux-Next (next-20130411) with attached patchset (incl.
your cpufreq-next-fixes).

Test-Case...

CONFIG_X86_INTEL_PSTATE=y

root# echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu3/online

Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>

...did not test on-reboot-case.

( Dirk promised to test as well... )


Tested with:
 while true
 do
 echo 0 > online
 echo 1 > online
 done
For several minutes and rebooting several times seems to have fixed the
issue.

Nathan, Sorry for calling out your patch erroneously I should have paid closer
attention.

Viresh you can add my Tested-by:

Thanks
--Dirk
- Sedat -

@Rafael: I will probably be down for one more week and so not doing any
reviews for now... I do check important mails sent directly to me though.

------------x----------------------x------------------

From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 22:43:57 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: Don't call __cpufreq_governor() for drivers without
  target()

Some cpufreq drivers implement their own governor and so don't need us to call
generic governors interface via __cpufreq_governor(). Few recent commits haven't
obeyed this law well and we saw some regressions.

This patch tries to fix this issue.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 3564947..a6f6595 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -858,13 +858,18 @@ static int cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(unsigned int
cpu, unsigned int sibling,
                                   struct device *dev)
  {
         struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
-       int ret = 0;
+       int ret = 0, has_target = 0;
         unsigned long flags;

         policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(sibling);
         WARN_ON(!policy);

-       __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);
+       rcu_read_lock();
+       has_target = !!rcu_dereference(cpufreq_driver)->target;
+       rcu_read_unlock();
+
+       if (has_target)
+               __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);

         lock_policy_rwsem_write(sibling);

@@ -877,8 +882,10 @@ static int cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(unsigned int
cpu, unsigned int sibling,

         unlock_policy_rwsem_write(sibling);

-       __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
-       __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
+       if (has_target) {
+               __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
+               __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
+       }

         ret = sysfs_create_link(&dev->kobj, &policy->kobj, "cpufreq");
         if (ret) {
@@ -1146,7 +1153,8 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev(struct device
*dev, struct subsys_interface *sif

         /* If cpu is last user of policy, free policy */
         if (cpus == 1) {
-               __cpufreq_governor(data, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
+               if (has_target)
+                       __cpufreq_governor(data, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);

                 lock_policy_rwsem_read(cpu);
                 kobj = &data->kobj;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux