Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20130409:
>
> The vfs tree lost its build failure.
>

Beyond build-failures in vfs-next [0] and [1], it was not bootable
(see [2] till [4])!
This is now all fixed, thanks to all involved people!

$ cat /proc/version
Linux version 3.9.0-rc6-next20130410-1-iniza-small
(sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx@fambox) (gcc version 4.6.3 (Ubuntu/Linaro
4.6.3-1ubuntu5) ) #1 SMP Wed Apr 10 11:55:58 CEST 2013

NOTE: There still exists the NULL-pointer-deref in cpufreq for me on
Intel SandyBridge CPU (see [5]) on reboot and when CPUs get offline.

- Sedat -

[0] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/7/229
[1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-next&m=136552249527170&w=2
[2] http://marc.info/?t=136545773000008&r=1&w=2
[3] http://marc.info/?t=136545603700003&r=1&w=2
[4] http://marc.info/?l=linux-next&m=136552718229123&w=2
[5] http://marc.info/?t=136551588400003&r=1&w=2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux