Re: [PATCH] cpufreq / intel_pstate: Optimize intel_pstate_set_policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 4:08 AM, Srinivas Pandruvada
<srinivas.pandruvada@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This function is called quite often from other subsystems.
> Removed unused call to intel_pstate_get_min_max().
> Also when "policy->policy == CPUFREQ_POLICY_PERFORMANCE", then
> no need to do calculations as the limits will be forced anyway.

> Also corrected filename in the header.

Probably separate this out in a different patch.

> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 21 +++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> index f6dd1e7..f3729d4 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
>  /*
> - * cpufreq_snb.c: Native P state management for Intel processors
> + * intel_pstate.c: Native P state management for Intel processors
>   *
>   * (C) Copyright 2012 Intel Corporation
>   * Author: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@xxxxxxxxx>
> @@ -658,30 +658,27 @@ static unsigned int intel_pstate_get(unsigned int cpu_num)
>  static int intel_pstate_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>  {
>         struct cpudata *cpu;
> -       int min, max;
>
>         cpu = all_cpu_data[policy->cpu];
>
>         if (!policy->cpuinfo.max_freq)
>                 return -ENODEV;
>
> -       intel_pstate_get_min_max(cpu, &min, &max);
> -
> -       limits.min_perf_pct = (policy->min * 100) / policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
> -       limits.min_perf_pct = clamp_t(int, limits.min_perf_pct, 0 , 100);
> -       limits.min_perf = div_fp(int_tofp(limits.min_perf_pct), int_tofp(100));
> -
> -       limits.max_perf_pct = policy->max * 100 / policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
> -       limits.max_perf_pct = clamp_t(int, limits.max_perf_pct, 0 , 100);
> -       limits.max_perf = div_fp(int_tofp(limits.max_perf_pct), int_tofp(100));
> -
>         if (policy->policy == CPUFREQ_POLICY_PERFORMANCE) {
>                 limits.min_perf_pct = 100;
>                 limits.min_perf = int_tofp(1);
>                 limits.max_perf_pct = 100;
>                 limits.max_perf = int_tofp(1);
>                 limits.no_turbo = 0;
> +               return 0;
>         }
> +       limits.min_perf_pct = (policy->min * 100) / policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
> +       limits.min_perf_pct = clamp_t(int, limits.min_perf_pct, 0 , 100);
> +       limits.min_perf = div_fp(int_tofp(limits.min_perf_pct), int_tofp(100));
> +
> +       limits.max_perf_pct = policy->max * 100 / policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
> +       limits.max_perf_pct = clamp_t(int, limits.max_perf_pct, 0 , 100);
> +       limits.max_perf = div_fp(int_tofp(limits.max_perf_pct), int_tofp(100));

Otherwise it looks fine:

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux