On Monday, April 08, 2013 09:02:44 PM Kukjin Kim wrote: > amit daniel kachhap wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Thursday, March 28, 2013 01:35:18 PM Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote: > > >> Submitting the V5 version of exynos5440 cpufreq driver. This patchset > > addresses > > >> all the coding and design concerns raised especially by Viresh. > > >> > > >> Changes in V5: > > >> * Removed the unnecessary DT look up entry from mach-exynos5-dt.c. > > >> * Fixed all coding and comments issue raised by Viresh. > > >> > > >> Changes in V4: > > >> * Added dev_err logs instead of pr_err. > > >> * Used the devm_ioremap_resource API. > > >> * Implemented several coding guidelines and minor error comments from > > Sylwester, > > >> Russell and Viresh. > > >> > > >> Changes in V3: > > >> * Converted the driver to probe based as suggested by Viresh. This is > > also > > >> beneficial for multiplatform kernel. > > >> * Other coding guidelines related changes. > > >> * Moved the DT node outside cpu0 node as the driver is now a platform > > >> driver. > > >> > > >> Changes in V2: > > >> * Added OPP library support to parse DT parameters. > > >> * Removed a hack to handle interrupts in bootup. > > >> * Implemented other review comments from Viresh and Inder. > > >> > > >> All these patches are dependent on Thomas Abraham common clock patches. > > >> (http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung- > > soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg15860.html) > > >> This whole patch series is based on 3.9-rc4. > > >> > > >> Amit Daniel Kachhap (4): > > >> cpufreq: exynos: Add cpufreq driver for exynos5440 > > >> cpufreq: exynos: Remove error return even if no soc is found > > >> arm: exynos: Enable OPP library support for exynos5440 > > >> arm: dts: Add cpufreq controller node for Exynos5440 SoC > > >> > > >> .../bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-exynos5440.txt | 28 ++ > > >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi | 12 + > > >> arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig | 2 + > > >> drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm | 9 + > > >> drivers/cpufreq/Makefile | 1 + > > >> drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 2 +- > > >> drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c | 474 > > ++++++++++++++++++++ > > >> 7 files changed, 527 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq- > > exynos5440.txt > > >> create mode 100644 drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c > > > > > > Is this for me or the Samsung tree? > > > > > > If it's for me, I need ACKs from the Samsung tree maintainers. Also, > > please > > > address the Viresh's comments. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Rafael > > > > > Hi Rafael, > > > > I submitted the V6 version with all comments from Viresh addressed. > > > > Hi Kukjin Kim, > > > > Any suggestion on how this patch should be merged. In my opinion it > > should go via Rafael's tree as this patch uses some fixes present in > > Rafael's tree like modified cpufreq_notify_transition API. > > > Yes, I agree. The v6 series including resending 1/4 patch looks good to me. > But the patch V6 4/4 would be sent to upstream via samsung tree to avoid > useless merge conflicts and I think, it's possible. > > So Rafael, please take 1/4 ~ 3/4 patches in your tree with my ack. > > Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > If any problems, please let me know. I will, thank you! Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
