On 5 April 2013 12:36, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 5 April 2013 12:18, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Basically, this moving looks good to me, but should be re-worked based on >> for-next of samsung tree because this touches too many samsung stuff so this >> should be sent to upstream via samsung tree. > > Hmm... Its already applied in Rafael's tree. But it doesn't mean that > it can't be > moved to your tree if there is a issue. > > What tree/branch? I used: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git for-next > >> Applying: cpufreq: s3c24xx: move cpufreq driver to drivers/cpufreq >> error: patch failed: arch/arm/Kconfig:2166 >> error: arch/arm/Kconfig: patch does not apply > > above two are obvious as you haven't applied other patches in this series. > >> error: patch failed: arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/Kconfig:28 >> error: arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/Kconfig: patch does not apply >> error: patch failed: arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/Makefile:17 >> error: arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/Makefile: patch does not apply >> error: patch failed: drivers/cpufreq/Makefile:63 >> error: drivers/cpufreq/Makefile: patch does not apply > > Same here. > >> error: drivers/cpufreq/s3c2412-cpufreq.c: does not exist in index > > I can still see it in for-next. > > Attached is my patch based of your for-next Kukjin, As Rafael has already dropped it, can you apply it at your end and make sure it doesn't miss the merge cycle? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
