Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] cpufreq: covert the cpufreq_data_lock to a spinlock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 10:41:27PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, April 01, 2013 03:11:09 PM Nathan Zimmer wrote:
> > This eliminates the rest of the contention found in __cpufreq_cpu_get.
> > I am not seeing a way to use the rcu so we will have to make due with a
> > rwlock for now.
> > 
> > Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@xxxxxxx>
> 
> I've already applied this one.
> 
> Can you please check if the version in my tree is OK?
> 
> Rafael
> 

Nope, the previous version was too different, probably best to just replace it.
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux