Re: intel_pstate_timer_func divide by zero oops

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Dirk Brandewie
<dirk.brandewie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> pid_param_set() is on the stack which means that something is changing
>>> the debugfs parameters or the stack is FUBAR.
>>>
>> I somehow doubt the stack is messed up as the call traces are always
>> identical.
>> (pid_param_set() seems to be in first trace as well.)
>>
>
> I agree that the two oops are likely the same but unless something is
> crawling
> through debugfs writing random values to the files there pid_param_set()
> should not be on any stack anywhere.

Ok.

>
> There was a similar bug reported by fedora:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920289
>
> This bug has not showed up again since rc3 can you try the current rc to see
> if
> you still see the problem?
>

I updated the Fedora BZ - the oops I got is from latest git as of
yesterday. So I think the bug is still there post -rc3.

Parag
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux