On 22 March 2013 16:42, Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> In cpufreq_stats_free_sysfs() we aren't balancing calls to cpufreq_cpu_get() >> with cpufreq_cpu_put(). This will never let us have ref count to policy->kobj as >> zero. > > Rafael, > > Since this prevents booting on our hardware (we unregister and > re-register the cpufreq driver to account for virtual cores), will > this be considered as a hotfix for 3.9? > >> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@xxxxxxxxxx> Sorry i forgot to mention, this should be pushed for next rc. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
