https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55411 --- Comment #3 from Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@xxxxxxx> 2013-03-18 09:38:55 --- Created an attachment (id=95711) --> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=95711) cpufreq-info, post-resume (bad) Bad (post-resume) cpufreq-info. As expected given the missing symlinks, cpus 2 and 4 don't show anything. But what happened to cpu5? Why is it saying it runs at the same hardware frequency as cpu3, NOT cpu4 as before, and why is it saying that, yet never-the-less saying it's alone, software-coordination-wise? And if cpu5 is supposed to be hardware-frequency-linked to cpu3 now, why doesn't cpu3 list cpu5 as cpu5 lists cpu3? Goofy values indeed! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
