On 09:56-20130315, Jon Hunter wrote: [..] > > But, that said, there is one path I see possible: > > - keep omap-cpufreq alive (BUT I will add a patch that will not let it init > > when in DT entries are present) > > - add DT entries for all relevant OMAPs - in DT mode, we will *only* > > support cpufreq-cpu0 > > - All future SoCs will continue to use cpufreq-cpu0 using DT, as was the > > alignment I believe. > > Yes that is what we are doing for other drivers and should be done here. OK. I guess we have not much of a choice with the legacy baggage we carry around :(. Will redo the series for the same. -- Regards, Nishanth Menon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
