Hi Nishanth, > -----Original Message----- > From: linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-omap- > owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Menon, Nishanth > Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 8:06 PM > To: Cousson, Benoit > Cc: Shilimkar, Santosh; cpufreq; Rafael J. Wysocki; Shawn Guo; linux- > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: support for clock which > are not in DT yet. > > On 15:24-20130312, Benoit Cousson wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > > > On 03/12/2013 06:03 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > > > On Tuesday 12 March 2013 04:35 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote: > > >> On certain SoCs like variants of OMAP, the clock conversion to DT > > >> is not complete. In short, the ability to: > > >> cpus { > > >> cpu@0 { > > >> clocks = <&cpuclk 0>; > > >> }; > > >> }; > > >> is not possible. However, the clock node is registered. > > >> Allow for clk names to be provided as string so as to be used when > needed. > > >> Example (for OMAP3630): > > >> cpus { > > >> cpu@0 { > > >> clock-name = "cpufreq_ck"; > > >> }; > > >> }; > > >> > > >> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> > > >> Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx> > > >> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx> > > >> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > >> Cc: cpufreq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > >> Cc: linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > >> Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > >> > > >> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> > > >> --- > > > Seems a reasonable to me. > > > > No, it is not... > > > > You cannot add a temp binding just because the OMAP support is not > > there, since the real binding already exist. > > > > You need to register properly a clock provider to be able to > reference > > it. > > If you do need a hacky temp code you could do it in OMAP code but not > > in the binding. > > OK. My intent is to remove omap-cpufreq.c. So, I guess I could do > something like the following (not tested yet), but would that be the > right approach? Similar attempt was done for am33xx_clks in this by Shawn: http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg84157.html > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock2420_data.c b/arch/arm/mach- > omap2/cclock2420_data.c > index 0f0a97c..c3017deb 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock2420_data.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock2420_data.c > @@ -1885,7 +1885,7 @@ static struct omap_clk omap2420_clks[] = { > CLK(NULL, "timer_32k_ck", &func_32k_ck, CK_242X), > CLK(NULL, "timer_sys_ck", &sys_ck, CK_242X), > CLK(NULL, "timer_ext_ck", &alt_ck, CK_242X), > - CLK(NULL, "cpufreq_ck", &virt_prcm_set, CK_242X), > + CLK(NULL, "cpufreq-cpu0.0", &virt_prcm_set, CK_242X), > }; > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock2430_data.c b/arch/arm/mach- > omap2/cclock2430_data.c > index aed8f74..7000ca4 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock2430_data.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock2430_data.c > @@ -2001,7 +2001,7 @@ static struct omap_clk omap2430_clks[] = { > CLK(NULL, "timer_32k_ck", &func_32k_ck, CK_243X), > CLK(NULL, "timer_sys_ck", &sys_ck, CK_243X), > CLK(NULL, "timer_ext_ck", &alt_ck, CK_243X), > - CLK(NULL, "cpufreq_ck", &virt_prcm_set, CK_243X), > + CLK(NULL, "cpufreq-cpu0.0", &virt_prcm_set, CK_243X), Device name and the clk_name should be interchanged right? Something like this? CLK("cpufreq-cpu0.0", NULL, &virt_prcm_set, CK_243X), If yes the same should apply to all the instances. > }; > > static const char *enable_init_clks[] = { diff --git a/arch/arm/mach- > omap2/cclock3xxx_data.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock3xxx_data.c > index 4579c3c..7a1dfde 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock3xxx_data.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock3xxx_data.c > @@ -3501,7 +3501,7 @@ static struct omap_clk omap3xxx_clks[] = { > CLK(NULL, "uart4_ick", &uart4_ick_am35xx, CK_AM35XX), > CLK(NULL, "timer_32k_ck", &omap_32k_fck, CK_3XXX), > CLK(NULL, "timer_sys_ck", &sys_ck, CK_3XXX), > - CLK(NULL, "cpufreq_ck", &dpll1_ck, CK_3XXX), > + CLK(NULL, "cpufreq-cpu0.0", &dpll1_ck, CK_3XXX), > }; > > static const char *enable_init_clks[] = { diff --git a/arch/arm/mach- > omap2/cclock44xx_data.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock44xx_data.c > index 3d58f33..5fad1da 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock44xx_data.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock44xx_data.c > @@ -1660,7 +1660,7 @@ static struct omap_clk omap44xx_clks[] = { > CLK("4013a000.timer", "timer_sys_ck", &syc_clk_div_ck, > CK_443X), > CLK("4013c000.timer", "timer_sys_ck", &syc_clk_div_ck, > CK_443X), > CLK("4013e000.timer", "timer_sys_ck", &syc_clk_div_ck, > CK_443X), > - CLK(NULL, "cpufreq_ck", &dpll_mpu_ck, CK_443X), > + CLK(NULL, "cpufreq-cpu0.0", &dpll_mpu_ck, CK_443X), > }; > > int __init omap4xxx_clk_init(void) > -- > Regards, > Nishanth Menon > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" > in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo > info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
