On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:03 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Monday, March 11, 2013 10:55:00 PM Zhang Rui wrote:
>> On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 09:35 +0200, Silviu-Mihai Popescu wrote:
>> > Convert all uses of devm_request_and_ioremap() to the newly introduced
>> > devm_ioremap_resource() which provides more consistent error handling.
>> >
>> > devm_ioremap_resource() provides its own error messages so all explicit
>> > error messages can be removed from the failure code paths.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Silviu-Mihai Popescu <silviupopescu1990@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c | 8 +++-----
>> > drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-kirkwood.c | 6 +++---
>> > drivers/thermal/kirkwood_thermal.c | 8 +++-----
>> > 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c
>> > index 0e83e3c..6052476 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c
>> > @@ -175,11 +175,9 @@ static int kirkwood_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Cannot get memory resource\n");
>> > return -ENODEV;
>> > }
>> > - priv.base = devm_request_and_ioremap(&pdev->dev, res);
>> > - if (!priv.base) {
>> > - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Cannot ioremap\n");
>> > - return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
>> > - }
>> > + priv.base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
>> > + if (IS_ERR(priv.base))
>> > + return PTR_ERR(priv.base);
>> >
>> > np = of_find_node_by_path("/cpus/cpu@0");
>> > if (!np)
>> > diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-kirkwood.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-kirkwood.c
>> > index 670aa1e..53aad73 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-kirkwood.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-kirkwood.c
>> > @@ -66,9 +66,9 @@ static int kirkwood_cpuidle_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> > if (res == NULL)
>> > return -EINVAL;
>> >
>> > - ddr_operation_base = devm_request_and_ioremap(&pdev->dev, res);
>> > - if (!ddr_operation_base)
>> > - return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
>> > + ddr_operation_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
>> > + if (IS_ERR(ddr_operation_base))
>> > + return PTR_ERR(ddr_operation_base);
>> >
>> > device = &per_cpu(kirkwood_cpuidle_device, smp_processor_id());
>> > device->state_count = KIRKWOOD_MAX_STATES;
>> > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/kirkwood_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/kirkwood_thermal.c
>> > index 65cb4f0..e5500ed 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/thermal/kirkwood_thermal.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/kirkwood_thermal.c
>> > @@ -85,11 +85,9 @@ static int kirkwood_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> > if (!priv)
>> > return -ENOMEM;
>> >
>> > - priv->sensor = devm_request_and_ioremap(&pdev->dev, res);
>> > - if (!priv->sensor) {
>> > - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to request_ioremap memory\n");
>> > - return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
>> > - }
>> > + priv->sensor = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
>> > + if (IS_ERR(priv->sensor))
>> > + return PTR_ERR(priv->sensor);
>> >
>> > thermal = thermal_zone_device_register("kirkwood_thermal", 0, 0,
>> > priv, &ops, NULL, 0, 0);
>>
>> there is already a fix for kirkwood_thermal.c at
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-pm&m=136238017027514&w=2
>> and it has been applied to thermal -next.
>>
>> would you please refreshed the patch?
>
> Are you going to take that patch into your tree, then?
Hello,
I have sent a second version of the patch which does not modify
kirkwood_thermal.c.
Therefore the existing patch and the one I resent can be applied independently.
--
Silviu Popescu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
