On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This binding makes no sense to me. It needs to be substantially better > documented, not just a couple of sentences that people that understand > bit.LITTLE thoroughly can make sense of. > > It also duplicates the cpu binding. I suspect this should instead be done > through additions of the cpu bindings instead of duplication. So this needs to > be substantially reworked. Also, _ALWAYS_ cc devicetree-discuss on new bindings. get_maintainer tells you to do so. -Olof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
