Re: [PATCH linux-next] cpufreq: conservative: Fix sampling_down_factor functionality

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5 March 2013 22:21, David C Niemi <dniemi@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'd like to ask -- what is the intended use of the conservative governor these days as differentiated from the ondemand governor?  At one time it seemed more oriented towards power savings, but the ondemand governor had picked up most or all of its power-saving features.

I believe the difference is still the same.. conservative is not as
aggressive as
ondemand now also, i don't know which people are using it though :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux