On 12 February 2013 06:42, amit kachhap <amit.kachhap@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Inderpal Singh
> <inderpal.singh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 8 February 2013 00:03, amit kachhap <amit.kachhap@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Inderpal Singh
>>> <inderpal.singh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> On 7 February 2013 01:09, Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> Add cpufreq controller device node for Exynos5440 SoC for passing
>>>>> parameters like controller base address, interrupt and cpufreq
>>>>> table.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
>>>>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi
>>>>> index 024269d..b20b517 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi
>>>>> @@ -63,6 +63,15 @@
>>>>>
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> + cpufreq@160000 {
>>>>> + compatible = "samsung,exynos5440-cpufreq";
>>>>> + reg = <0x160000 0x1000>;
>>>>> + interrupts = <0 57 0>;
>>>>> + cpufreq_tbl = < 1200000 1025000
>>>>> + 1000000 975000
>>>>> + 800000 925000 >;
>>>>> + };
>>>>> +
>>>>
>>>> I think cpufreq_tbl should be part of the cpu node as it's the
>>>> property of the cpu.
>>>> Please refer cpufreq-cpu0 and spear-cpufreq.
>>>
>>> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/15364.
>>> In this thread same discussion followed. I am not sure what is the
>>> correct way but looks like Kukjin concluded this with a timer node
>>> separate from the CPU code.
>>>
>>
>> I am only talking about cpufreq_tbl and its nothing but operating
>> points for the cpus. It seems its agreed upon to add operating-points
>> to cpu node as being done by all other platforms like imx6q, am33xx,
>> cpufreq-cpu0 and spear.
>
> Even timer, GIC, cpufreq tbl, pmu etc are all cpu properties. But the
> problem is whether to put them in cpu0 or repeat same information in
> all cpu nodes as it is common to all cpu's and not just cpu0. So as
You don't have to repeat the same cpufreq_tbl for all cpu nodes.
Having table in only cpu0 node is sufficient as being done in other platforms.
Thanks,
Inder
> Kukjin kim has put the timer node outside the cpu node so i also
> followed the same convention.
>
> Mr Kim,
> Any issue in this approach?
>
> Thanks,
> Amit Daniel
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Inder
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Amit Daniel
>>>>
>>>>> serial@B0000 {
>>>>> compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-uart";
>>>>> reg = <0xB0000 0x1000>;
>>>>> --
>>>>> 1.7.10.4
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
>>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>> --
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
