On 8 February 2013 00:48, <Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 07 Feb 2013 13:11:52 +0530, Viresh Kumar said: > >> First of all i want to confirm something about your system. I am sure it is a >> multi-policy system (or multi cluster system). i.e. there are more than one >> clock line for different cpus ? And so multiple struct policy exist >> simultaneously. > > Hmm.. it's a bog-standard Dell Latitude E6500 laptop, with a single > Core2 Duo P8700 CPU (one die, 2 cores, no HT). It's apparently able > to clock both cores at different speeds (one core running busy at 2540mhz > and the other idling at 800mhz), if that's what you mean by multiple > clock lines. Perfect!! So, when the cpus can manage different freqs, we have multiple struct policies for them per cpu. > In any case, next-20130206 complained, and with this patch added I see > nothing in dmesg and cpufreq is acting properly on both cores, so: > > Tested-By: Valdis Kletnieks <valdis.kletnieks@xxxxxx> Thanks. > (btw - I had to hand-apply your patch, as it showed up white-space > damaged. Three lines wrapped, and tabs converted to spaces). I know that and feeling bad for you :( I gave you this because of my mails issue :) http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/vireshk/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/for-valdis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
