On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 22:24:39 +0100, "Rafael J. Wysocki" said: > On Wednesday, February 06, 2013 12:44:35 PM Valdis Kletnieks wrote: > > Seen in dmesg. next-20130128 was OK. Haven't done a bisect, but can > > do so if the offender isn't obvious... > > I suppose this is 73bf0fc "cpufreq: Don't remove sysfs link for policy->cpu". > > Can you test the linux-pm.git/pm-cpufreq branch alone, please, and see > if that's this one (top-most commit)? Color me mystified. I can't find that commit by either number or the description: [/usr/src/linux-next] git log | egrep -i 'cpufreq.*remove.*link' [/usr/src/linux-next] git log | grep -i 73bf0fc [/usr/src/linux-next] Was that a very recent commit that may have gotten pushed too late for the next-20130206 merge?
Attachment:
pgpph0GHSg5Q_.pgp
Description: PGP signature
