Re: [PATCH 5/7] cpufreq: balance out cpufreq_cpu_{get,put} for scaling drivers using setpolicy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/05/2013 06:45 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 6 February 2013 07:38, Dirk Brandewie <dirk.brandewie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 02/05/2013 05:58 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:

On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:54 PM,  <dirk.brandewie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.brandewie@xxxxxxxxx>

There is an additional reference added to the driver in
cpufreq_add_dev()  that is removed in__cpufreq_governor() if the

driver implements target().  Remove the last reference when the
driver implements setpolicy()

Signed-off-by: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@xxxxxxxxx>

---
   drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c |    3 +++
   1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 622e282..d17477b 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1049,6 +1049,9 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev(struct device *dev,
struct subsys_interface *sif

          if (cpufreq_driver->target)
                  __cpufreq_governor(data, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);

+       if (cpufreq_driver->setpolicy)
+               cpufreq_cpu_put(data);


I don't understand this patch at all.. I grepped both cpufreq_cpu_get() &
put()
in bleeding-edge and found everything to be correct.

Can you please point me to the exact line numbers ?


Line 878 in cpufreq_add_dev()

Following is line 878:

	for_each_online_cpu(sibling) {
		struct cpufreq_policy *cp = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, sibling);
		if (cp && cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cp->related_cpus))
			return cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(cpu, sibling, dev);
	}

How is this related to your patch?

our files are clearly out of sync :-)  The code in cpufreq_add_dev() is
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
	/* check whether a different CPU already registered this
	 * CPU because it is in the same boat. */
	policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
	if (unlikely(policy)) {
		cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
		return 0;
	}

The reference added by this cpufreq_cpu_get() is finally dropped in __cpufreq_remove_dev() with the call to __cpufreq_governor()

	if (driver->target)
		__cpufreq_governor(data, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);

Without this change I hang at:
		pr_debug("waiting for dropping of refcount\n");
		wait_for_completion(cmp);

--Dirk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux