On Wednesday, February 06, 2013 03:45:58 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 6 February 2013 15:38, Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I have pushed the complete patchset here: > >> > >> http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/vireshk/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/cpufreq-updates > >> > > > > Viresh, perhaps you should ask Stephen Rothwell to pull in your tree > > to get some more testing before Rafael pulls it in for 3.10? > > Its has been made clear by Rafael that these patches wouldn't make it for > 3.9 (though i wanted them to :) ), and so once the merge window is over > Rafael might pull them in and so they would reach Stephen's linux-next too... > > I am not sure if sending a cpufreq pull request directly to Stephen is > preferred. > @Rafael: ?? You may do that, if you want, but that's slightly confusing. Also the policy is that material which is not going to be included into v3.9 shouldn't be in linux-next before v3.9-rc1. Moreover, for build testing it is sufficient to put it into a branch somewhere at git.kernel.org (as you have already noticed :-)). Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
