Re: BUG in bleeding edge c560f3d

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday, February 05, 2013 10:45:03 AM Dirk Brandewie wrote:
> On 02/04/2013 11:08 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > @Dirk: Please give this one a try. Atleast on my system with various
> > configurations, i
> > couldn't see any different this patch has made, but is more logical to me.
> >
> 
> Tested works fine with and without my driver present.
> 
> I added it to my patch set with my Tested-by tag it seems gmail decided
> to swallow it :-(
> 
> Please feel to add my Tested-by:

I will, thanks Dirk!

Rafael


> > commit 9bdd6d47403e696d05953870019e791806f8d6bf
> > Author: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date:   Tue Feb 5 12:28:18 2013 +0530
> >
> >      cpufreq: Don't remove sysfs link for policy->cpu
> >
> >      "cpufreq" directory in policy->cpu is never created using
> > sysfs_create_link(),
> >      but using kobject_init_and_add(). And so we shouldn't call
> > sysfs_remove_link()
> >      for policy->cpu(). sysfs stuff for policy->cpu is automatically
> > removed when we
> >      call kobject_put() for dying policy.
> >
> >      Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 5 +++--
> >   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > index 7aacfbf..9567451 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > @@ -1047,7 +1047,9 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev(struct device
> > *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif
> >          cpus = cpumask_weight(data->cpus);
> >          cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, data->cpus);
> >
> > -       if (unlikely((cpu == data->cpu) && (cpus > 1))) {
> > +       if (cpu != data->cpu) {
> > +               sysfs_remove_link(&dev->kobj, "cpufreq");
> > +       } else if (cpus > 1) {
> >                  /* first sibling now owns the new sysfs dir */
> >                  cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(cpumask_first(data->cpus));
> >                  sysfs_remove_link(&cpu_dev->kobj, "cpufreq");
> > @@ -1072,7 +1074,6 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev(struct device
> > *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif
> >          pr_debug("%s: removing link, cpu: %d\n", __func__, cpu);
> >          cpufreq_cpu_put(data);
> >          unlock_policy_rwsem_write(cpu);
> > -       sysfs_remove_link(&dev->kobj, "cpufreq");
> >
> >          /* If cpu is last user of policy, free policy */
> >          if (cpus == 1) {
> >
> 
-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux