On 4 February 2013 17:47, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Well, [1-2/4] are things I can take for v3.9 no problem. The other two I'd > wait for the next cycle to be honest. We already have 30+ cpufreq patches > scheduled for v3.9 and some of them quite subtle for that matter. To be honest, i wanted to get these in 3.9 :) . And that's why hurried on them and got this full series working in a single day of work :) Anyway, i understand your point and i also believe last two patches require some testing/review before these getting in. One important point i would like to highlight is: governors directory would be present in cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/ now instead of cpu/cpufreq/. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
