On 1 February 2013 04:21, Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:23:54PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> This time I was *really* confused as to what patches I was supposed to take, >> from whom and in what order, so I applied a number of them in the order given >> by patchwork. That worked well enough, because (almost) all of them applied >> for me without conflicts. That said I would appreciate it if you could look >> into the bleeding-edge branch of my tree and see if there's anything missing >> or something that shouldn't be there (cpufreq-wise). > > Sorry for the confusion, your current bleeding-edge branch (eed52da) > looks good to me. I also did a quick build and run and it works fine on > my setup. Really!! I see bleeding edge as df0e3f4 and i don't see the $(subject) patch in it :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
