Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: governors: Get rid of dbs_data->enable field

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:58:01PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> CPUFREQ_GOV_START/STOP are called only once for all policy->cpus and hence we
> don't need to adapt cpufreq_governor_dbs() routine for multiple calls.
> 
> So, this patch removes dbs_data->enable field entirely. And rearrange code a
> bit.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Hi Fabio,
> 
> I have fixed all the pending issues, but haven't checked these patches. Can you
> please add your tested-by (obviously after testing them) ?
> 
> Compile tested only.

Hello Viresh, thanks for getting this done... looks much cleaner now!

I tested both patches on my ux500 setup (dual Cortex-A9) and it seems to
run correctly on both CPU load changes and CPU hotplug, so:

Tested-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@xxxxxxxxxx>

As a sidenote, I noticed just now that since:

bc92bea cpufreq: Notify governors when cpus are hot-[un]plugged

governor's sampling_rate gets reset to default every time you hotplug a
CPU (the one you read/write on
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/ondemand/sampling_rate).

If you need further tests, I'll be back on Monday.

Thanks,
Fabio

-- 
Fabio Baltieri
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux