RE: [PATCH] mailbox: prevent pl320-ipc code from breaking none-AMBA systems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> From: Rafael J. Wysocki [rjw@xxxxxxx]
> On Tuesday, January 29, 2013 10:36:53 AM Mark Langsdorf wrote:
> > The pl320-ipc code depends on ARM AMBA, and should have the dependency
> > in its Kconfig.
> 
> May I fold this into "ARM / highbank: add support for pl320 IPC"?

Yes. I didn't want to regenerate the patch series =)

--Mark Langsdorf
Calxeda, Inc.

> Signed-off-by: Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/mailbox/Kconfig | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig b/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
> index 9489554..9545c9f 100644
> --- a/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ menuconfig MAILBOX
>  if MAILBOX
>  config PL320_MBOX
>       bool "ARM PL320 Mailbox"
> +     depends on ARM_AMBA
>       help
>         An implementation of the ARM PL320 Interprocessor Communication
>         Mailbox (IPCM), tailored for the Calxeda Highbank. It is used to
>
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux