On 29 January 2013 10:09, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > With the addition of following patch, related_cpus is required to be set by > cpufreq platform drivers: > > commit c1070fd743533efb54e98142252283583f379190 > Author: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Mon Jan 14 13:23:04 2013 +0000 > > cpufreq: Simplify cpufreq_add_dev() > > Because this change is required by all platform drivers, why not do this in the > core itself. Hence, this patch is an attempt towards fixing all broken drivers. > > From now on, platforms don't really need to set related_cpus from their init() > routines, as the same work is done by core too. > > If platform driver needs to set the related_cpus mask with some additional cpus, > other than cpus present in policy->cpus, they are free to do it as we aren't > overriding anything. > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Inderpal, > > Can you please add your tested-by for this patch? And this will require you to > drop your patch for exynos-cpufreq.c :) ARM mail servers are broken. Patches attached.
Attachment:
0001-cpufreq-Set-policy-related_cpus-to-atleast-policy-cp.patch
Description: Binary data
Attachment:
0002-Revert-cpufreq-Don-t-use-cpu-removed-during-cpufreq_.patch
Description: Binary data
