On Monday, January 21, 2013 01:04:02 AM Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 03:18:11PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Well, it all looks reasonable to me. > > > > I suppose you'd like it to go into v3.8 plus v3.7-stable, right? > > Well, sort of. > > Patch 0001 which you've already taken and tagged for 3.7-stable and is > on its way to 3.8 is fine since it fixes a bug. > > The rest are, IMHO, more or less annoyances fixes which could easily > wait for 3.9 and maybe be backported if there really is an issue. Also, > they'd see a lot more testing this way. Because in at least 99% of the > cases, acpi-cpufreq and powernow-k8 are modules and the handoff works > there. > > This is at least how I see it, you tell me whether it makes sense or > not. Yes, it does. I will take [2-6/6] for v3.9, then, if there are no objections. Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
