On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 04:23:47PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:54:37PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > > So, handoff to acpi-cpufreq still has some issues. When both are > > built-in, the module_init functions turn into normal initcalls and > > in that case, they're executed in link order and it can happen that > > powernowk8_init() runs before acpi_cpufreq_init(). > > Just flip the link order? It's only the way it is because in the past we > wanted to try hardware-specific drivers before more generic ones, and I > don't think that's a concern in this case now. Yeah, I heard that the acpi-idle and intel-idle drivers do that and also heard that it was a hack. It doesn't look too ugly IMHO: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=2671717265ae6e720a9ba5f13fbec3a718983b65 -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
