On Monday, November 26, 2012 05:39:51 PM Fabio Baltieri wrote: > Hello Rafael, > > this patchset is a new version of the cpufreq SW coordinated CPU bug fix. > That's basically the v4 rebased on linux-pm's linux-next tree, split in 5 > patches for readability and with the bug fixed also in the "conservative" > governor. > > Regards, > Fabio > > > Changes: > v5 > - rebased/reimplemented on linux-next > - split hotplug code on a separate patch > - split ondemand/conservative specific fixes on separate patches > v4 > - moved update_sampling rate code on separate patch > - simplified dbs_sw_coordinated_cpus > - reworked timer handling for code readability, now: > * do_dbs_timer() [-> dbs_timer_coordinated()] -> dbs_timer_update() > - simplified cpu_callback cases > v3 > - original submission > > > Fabio Baltieri (4): > cpufreq: star/stop cpufreq timers on cpu hotplug > cpufreq: ondemand: call dbs_check_cpu only when necessary > cpufreq: conservative: call dbs_check_cpu only when necessary > cpufreq: ondemand: use all CPUs in update_sampling_rate > > Rickard Andersson (1): > cpufreq: handle SW coordinated CPUs > > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 46 ++++++++++++-- > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 106 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h | 2 + > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c | 62 +++++++++++++++---- > 4 files changed, 193 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) Applied to the linux-next branch of the linux-pm.git tree as v3.9 material. Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
