On 9 January 2013 21:09, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 9 January 2013 16:50, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> [Probably need to simplify cpufreq_add_dev() too, but that can be done as next >> step.] > > I have tried that too, it is also pushed at: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/16/5 > > [Untested for now, will be doing it tomorrow] > > From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 21:02:50 +0530 > Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: Simplify cpufreq_add_dev() > > Currently cpufreq_add_dev() firsts allocated policy, calls ->init() and then > checks if this cpu should be already managed or not. And if it already managed, > free its policy. > > We can save all this if we somehow know if this cpu is managed or not in > advance. policy->related_cpus contains list of all valid sibling cpus of > policy->cpu. We can check this to know if current cpu is already managed. > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> Tested-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
