Re: [PATCH V2] Fix problem with cpufreq_ondemand or cpufreq_conservative

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/01/2013 09:56 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
I know, V4 is already accepted, but i had an small comment with one
of your earlier change, which doesn't exist anymore :)

On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 5:51 AM, Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Index: wireless-testing-new/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c

How are you creating these patches? wireless-testing-new (linux directory names)
aren't supposed to be present here.

===================================================================
--- wireless-testing-new.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
+++ wireless-testing-new/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
@@ -316,3 +316,8 @@ second_time:
         return 0;
  }
  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_governor_dbs);
+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Alexander Clouter <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>");

You shouldn't be adding yourself as author here :)

MODULE_AUTHOR("Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@xxxxxxxxx>");
MODULE_AUTHOR("Alexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy@xxxxxxxxx>");

I was not adding myself - my name is not Alexander Clouter. When we were creating a new module, I got the author from the module that cpufreq_governor was originally a part. Perhaps I got the name wrong.

Thanks for the review mentioned in the next Email.

Larry


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux