On 12/28/2012 06:33 PM, Fabio Baltieri wrote:
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 05:45:54PM -0600, Larry Finger wrote:
I wonder if that's avoidable? The intention is not to create an additional
module, clearly.
It appears not to be possible. I don't know enough about to kmake to
understand why it is forcing a new module. Perhaps some expert knows
what Kconfig or Makefile magic will prevent that.
kbuild is building an additional module just because the makefile is
adding the new objects in the obj-m list directly, as in:
obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_ONDEMAND) += cpufreq_ondemand.o cpufreq_governor.o
obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_CONSERVATIVE) += cpufreq_conservative.o cpufreq_governor.o
To build just two modules the Makefile would have to be modified [1]
into something into something like:
obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_ONDEMAND) += cpufreq_ondemand_mod.o
cpufreq_ondemand_mod-y := cpufreq_ondemand.o cpufreq_governor.o
obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_CONSERVATIVE) += cpufreq_conservative_mod.o
cpufreq_conservative_mod-y := cpufreq_conservative.o cpufreq_governor.o
so that only two .o are added to obj-m, but that's not correct either as
you end up with cpufreq_governor symbols exported twice.
I think the only way would be to force cpufreq_governor as builtin with
an automatic Kconfig option.
Fabio
1. http://lxr.linux.no/#linux+v3.7.1/Documentation/kbuild/makefiles.txt#L191
Fabio,
Thanks for the explanation. Now I think I know how to do it.
V3 follows.
Larry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
