I thought I had addressed all the issues with the v9 version. The only comments I got on it was Mike's reviewed-by and I didn't think that warranted a resend. If you do want me to send it again, do you want it updated to current top-of-tree? That may take a bit, since there's an unrelated bug that's preventing my test box from booting. --Mark Langsdorf Calxeda, Inc. ________________________________________ From: Rafael J. Wysocki [rjw@xxxxxxx] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2012 7:12 AM To: Mark Langsdorf Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; cpufreq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6 v8] cpufreq: add support for Calxeda ECX-1000 (highbank) On Wednesday, December 05, 2012 10:48:35 AM Mark Langsdorf wrote: > This patch series adds cpufreq support for the Calxeda > ECX-1000 (highbank) SoCs. The EnergyCore Management Engine (ECME) on > the ECX-1000 manages the voltage for the part and communications with > Linux through a pl320 mailbox. clk notifications are used to control > when to send messages to the ECME. If you want me to handle this, can you please resend the whole patchset (with all of the comments addressed, if possible)? Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
