Re: [PATCH] Longhaul: Disable driver by default

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday, November 28, 2012 12:44:54 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 11:38:01 PM Rafał Bilski wrote:
> > 
> > > On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 10:13:55 PM Rafal Bilski wrote:
> > >> This is only solution I can think of. User decides if he wants this
> > >> driver on his machine. I don't have enough knowledge and time to find
> > >> the reason why same code works on some machines and doesn't on others
> > >> which use same, or very similar,  chipset and processor.
> > > I always have problems with patches like this one, because they are pretty much
> > > guaranteed to make someone complain.
> > >
> > > Is there any way to blacklist the affected machine you have?
> > >
> > > Rafael
> > No. Also problem seems to be larger than one machine. Also weirder.
> > One user claims his processor can't run below some frequency even
> > if it should be perfectly capable of doing so. System in question
> > freezes straight away. In past on good system I could change
> > frequency at least a couple of times without any protection. Just by
> > a chance. I tried to investigate "weird CPU 0 not listed by the BIOS"
> > message, but I have nothing. Also I seem to have far less time for
> > anything than in the past.
> 
> OK, I'll take the patch, then, but I won't include it in my first v3.8 pull
> request.

I'm queuing it up for submission as v3.8 material later in the cycle.

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux