On Thursday, December 06, 2012 02:08:31 PM Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On 12/6/2012 1:34 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> * Uncompromised performance > >>>>> * Balanced - biased towards performance (say, defined to be lowest power at most a 2 1/2% perf hit) > >>>>> * Balanced (say, at most a 5% perf hit) > >>>>> * Balanced - biased towards lower power (sat, at most a 10% perf hit) > >>>>> * Uncompromised lowest power > > > > That said starting with a small value and going up exponentially, like > > (1->)2->4->8->16->32->64, sounds like a good idea. > > > ... like 2 1/2, 5 and 10 ? ;-) In that case I'd prefer 2, 5, 10, 25, 50. I don't think we can be as precise here as to go into fractions realistically. Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
