On 22 October 2012 14:16, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 20 October 2012 01:42, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Initially ondemand governor was written and then using its code conservative >> governor is written. It used a lot of code from ondemand governor, but copy of >> code was created instead of using the same routines from both governors. Which >> increased code redundancy, which is difficult to manage. >> >> This patch is an attempt to move common part of both the governors to >> cpufreq_governor.c file to come over above mentioned issues. >> >> This shouldn't change anything from functionality point of view. >> >> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> For everybody else, this patch is already pushed by Rafael in his linux-next branch. -- viresh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
