On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Since the cpufreq table is dependant on the prmcu fw, it make sense to > keep the table there. Moreover since the cpufreq is already a mfd child > device added by the prcmu this make even more logic. Better there than elsewhere. > The next step after these patches will be to implement an "arm_clk" to be > used from cpufreq to update the opp instead of using the prcmu opp API directly. > This will then remove the last hard dependency to the prcmu API from cpufreq. Sounds like a plan. Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> Is this going to be merged through the cpufreq tree or the MFD tree? Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
