On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:36:54PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > Wouldn't it be much simpler to carve out the piece after > set_cpus_allowed_ptr(), put it in a sub-function called > __powernowk8_target() and call it with smp_call_function_single instead > of defining another work item? > > Would the workqueue code handle that or are there any other issues? The function grabs a mutex. smp_call_function wouldn't be too happy about that. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
