On Thursday, September 06, 2012 11:40:33 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, August 31, 2012, Michal Pecio wrote: > > From: Michal Pecio <mpecio@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Reevaluate CPU load and update frequency immediately whenever limits > > are changed. Currently ondemand doesn't do so when limits are relaxed, > > wasting power on CPUs with relatively low sampling rate. > > Also, update the prev_cpu_* variables on frequency transitions. Their > > old values aren't valid anymore because the governor assumes constant > > frequency during entire sampling period. > > > > Signed-off-by: Michal Pecio <mpecio@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Well, this makes sense to me. > > Thomas, what do you think? Looks fine to me as well. But the same should be done in the conservative driver as well then. Could you send another, separate patch doing the same in cpufreq_conservative.c. Thanks, Thomas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
