On Wednesday, September 05, 2012, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 03:38:12PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Well, what about actually avoiding the code duplication? That is, > > can you make OMAP be a user of your new core function and drop the > > OMAP-specific one, perhaps? > > > I would expect that the driver will replace the omap-cpufreq driver > completely at some point, where omap becomes a DT only platform. That's fine, but why do we need two almost identical functions to start with? Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
