On Thursday, July 26, 2012, Thomas Renninger wrote: > On Thursday, July 26, 2012 02:28:36 PM Andre Przywara wrote: > > The programming model for cpufreq on current AMD CPUs is almost > > identical to the one used on Intel and VIA hardware. This patchset > > merges support into acpi-cpufreq and removes it from powernow-k8. > > > This patchset is heavily based on Matthew Garrett's V4 from last July. > > The boosting part has been mostly reworked and documentation for it > > has been added. Also there was a need for (yet another) BIOS quirk > > on AMD desktop boards. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@xxxxxxx> > > I had a look at Matthew's patches and I like the idea. > > I didn't review Andre's in detail, but if they are based on > Matthew's and I expect they got some testing, I guess it should > be fine to push them with the next merge window. Good, thanks for your opinion, it helps a lot! :-) I'll have a deeper look at the patches in the next couple of days and will queue them up for v3.7 if I don't find anything objectionable in them. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
