On Monday, July 23, 2012, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote: > This patch initialises the cpu field of this_dbs_info structure. This > change is similar to existing ondemand governor. Why do you think the change is needed? Rafael > Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 1 + > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c > index 235a340..a1563d7 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c > @@ -504,6 +504,7 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, > j_dbs_info->prev_cpu_nice = > kcpustat_cpu(j).cpustat[CPUTIME_NICE]; > } > + this_dbs_info->cpu = cpu; > this_dbs_info->down_skip = 0; > this_dbs_info->requested_freq = policy->cur; > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
