I'm very sorry, but I don't see how bug 4059 could be fixed. In thread pointed by one of links user claims that his processor isn't even stable at lower frequencies. I don't see how it is possible because most VIA systems don't support voltage scaling. Reason I can think of is some processors need much more then 1ms to change frequency and are still in process of doing so when timer interrupt occurs (1000Hz timer and "ondemand" scenario). Another possibility is that some interrupts can't be masked even when asked to. And another one is SMI which isn't adressed by current source at all. Current Longhaul is much different then older one yet limiting it to known to work northbridges didn't help. Possibly support depends on chipset revision or system setup. Signed-off-by: Rafal Bilski <rafalbilski@xxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.x86 | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.x86 b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.x86 index 78ff7ee..4ae0f5c 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.x86 +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.x86 @@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ config X86_LONGRUN config X86_LONGHAUL tristate "VIA Cyrix III Longhaul" select CPU_FREQ_TABLE - depends on X86_32 && ACPI_PROCESSOR + depends on X86_32 && ACPI_PROCESSOR && BROKEN help This adds the CPUFreq driver for VIA Samuel/CyrixIII, VIA Cyrix Samuel/C3, VIA Cyrix Ezra and VIA Cyrix Ezra-T -- 1.7.9.3 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
