Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/2] RFC: CPU frequency max as PM QoS param

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Pihet-XID, Jean" <j-pihet@xxxxxx> writes:
> Re-adding cpufreq and linux-pm MLs in Cc.
>
> Regards,
> Jean

Thanks Jean. And sorry for causing the lists to get dropped.

Does anyone have comments about the user space interface for per device
constraints:

>>>>>> Another complication for the per device constraints is the user space
>>>>>> interface. Dynamic minors run out pretty fast if we have per CPU
>>>>>> parameters and the system has huge number of CPUs. Does anyone have any
>>>>>> opinions about the user space interface for device PM QoS?

My current view is that CPU frequency constraints could be global just
like the CPU latency constraints are.

	--Antti
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux