On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 14:31 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 16:01 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > Thing is, the scheduler doesn't care about completion, all it needs is > > to be able to kick-start the thing atomically. So you really have to > > wait for it or can you do an interrupt driven state machine? > > Or the scheduler callback could schedule a wq to do the job ? That'll end up being very ugly due to lock inversion etc. If we can get out of this using self-IPIs I'd much prefer that. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
