On Thursday, January 19, 2012, Antti P Miettinen wrote: > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> writes: > [..] > > Perhaps we need a new cpufreq governor that would take use PM QoS internally > > to store requests from different sources, but that would work on a per-CPU > > basis (not globally) and would provide a new interface for user space? > > > > Rafael > > I think it would be nice if the choice of governor could be independent > of the constraints. Also, implementing the constraints in the cpufreq > core is easier than in governors. Well, while it might be easier, the _whole_ _point_ of governors is to make decisions on the basis of available data. By introducing an independent mechanism for that we're bypassing governors in a sense. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
