On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 09:28:33PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote: > On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 12:24:11PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > - trans-latency : transition latency of cpu freq and related regulator, > in unit of ns. > Does it look better? I think it shouldn't include the regulator part of things. > If you think regulator thansition latency is board specific, then the board > dts can overrite it. We should just query this information from the regulator subsystem (there's hooks but currently nothing implements them). The regulators can define their own bindings if they need to read it from device tree, most of them should be able to do this as a function of knowing about the device. None of this is specific to cpufreq so cpufreq shouldn't have to define its own support for this. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
