Hey, On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 11:48:40PM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote: > On Wednesday 10 August 2011 13:27:20 Dominik Brodowski wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 09:00:11AM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote: > > > On Saturday 06 August 2011 17:18:29 Dominik Brodowski wrote: > > > > Currently, one needs to set the cpulist _before_ the subcommand, i.e. > > > > > > > > cpupower [ -c cpulist ] subcommand [ARGS] > > > > > > > > However, cpufrequtils used to allow to have "-c CPU" as a parameter to > > > > cpufreq-set(1) or cpufreq-info(1). Therefore, it may make sense to also > > > > support > > > Why exactly would this be an enhancement? > > > To be able to create an alias easier? > > > > Exactly. > > I also tried with "being able to do an alias" without success. > One idea could be to re-implement -c evaluation in frequency_info.c > BUT be aware that default switched: > - with cpufrequtils cpufreq-info by default showed all cpus > - with cpupower all read commands only show cpu 0 by default > > - with cpufrequtils cpufreq-set only sets the first cpu > - with cpupower all write commands write to all cpus > and this is on purpose and should not change. > So unfortunately an alias won't be possible. Well, it wouldn't be a backwards-compatible alias. But still, might it be worthwhile? What do you (and others reading this) think? Best, Dominik -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
