Jonathan Nieder wrote: > (1) This is still incredibly fragile. What *should* cpufrequtils > be doing to get the modules it needs? > > (2) Using the 3.0 or later kernel with old userspace gives bad > results (e.g., 30% increase in power consumption for one > reporter). That's a regression. The "30% increase" part was an unrelated bug (i915.i915_enable_rc6=1 brings power consumption back to normal), for those who were wondering. :) Old userspace automatically loading the wrong cpufreq drivers still does not seem great to me, though I don't have any great ideas about how to prevent that (a separate drivers/cpufreq-drivers/ directory does not sound too appealing). I guess I'd be most interested in how to fix (1) first. Thanks, Jonathan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
