On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 04:01:44PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:48:02AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 03:26:58PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > Some header change has removed an implicit include of module.h, breaking > > > the build due to the use of THIS_MODULE. Fix that. > > > is this dependant on the module.h changes that just got merged in -next > > from Paul Gortmaker ? If so, it should probably get merged as part of that set. > > Possibly, but there were a bunch of other failures in the Samsung > specific stuff not related to module.h which appeared today. I did run > into another non-samsung module.h failure, though. Mostly I was just > surprised stuff like this was showing up so late in the merge window, I > didn't spend a lot of time investigating what broke. wait, confused. Were you building Linus' tree, or -next ? Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
